Perfect — this is a quality-control KPI checklist, not volume targets.
Below is a clean, rateable KPI table you can actually use to score editors objectively.

This is written so you can tick ✔ / ✖ or score 0–5.


🎯 EDITOR KPI CHECKLIST — SHORT-FORM VIDEOS (ENTITY-LEVEL)

A. EXTRACTION & COVERAGE

KPI Descripción Pass / Fail
Moment Identification Short is built around a clear, standalone moment
No Dead Time No unnecessary pauses, filler, or slow lead-ins
One Idea Only Short communicates one clear idea / question / reaction
Unique Value Not a duplicate of another short (angle, hook, or focus differs)
Context Intact Viewer understands the moment without needing the full interview

B. HOOK QUALITY (FIRST 1–3 SECONDS)

KPI Descripción Score (0–5)
Immediate Engagement Something happens immediately (expression, statement, cut)
Curiosity Trigger Creates a question or tension in the viewer’s mind
Emotional Signal Clear emotion visible (interest, surprise, tension, amusement)
No Soft Intro No “so…”, “okay…”, walking, or setup delays
Scroll-Stop Potential Would you stop scrolling on this?

C. EDITING & TECHNICAL EXECUTION

KPI Descripción Pass / Fail
Clean Cut Points No awkward mid-word or mid-gesture cuts
Stable Framing Subject properly framed (headroom, eye line)
Speaker Focus Correct person is shown at the right moment
Audio Clarity Dialogue is clear, balanced, and intelligible
Consistent Style Matches project’s editing & subtitle style

D. SUBTITLES & READABILITY

KPI Descripción Pass / Fail
Accurate Subtitles Subtitles match spoken words exactly
Correct Timing Subtitles appear in sync with speech
Readable Placement Not covering face or key visual cues
Emphasis Used Key words highlighted (when appropriate)
No Overcrowding Lines are not too long or rushed

E. PLATFORM READINESS (ENTITY-LEVEL)

KPI Descripción Pass / Fail
Vertical Safe Zones No text or faces cut by UI elements
Thumbnail Frame Exists At least one strong frame suitable for thumbnail
Duration Optimised Length suits the platform (not dragged)
Standalone Asset Can be posted independently without explanation
Reusable Clip can be reused across platforms without re-edit

F. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT

KPI Descripción Score (0–5)
Fits Testing Workflow Designed to test a hook, not tell full story
Pre-Selection Friendly Shows confidence, reactions, or social proof
Reaction Visibility Facial expressions / reactions are clearly visible
Brand Safe No content that damages long-term brand
Long-Term Value Still usable 6–12 months from now

🧮 SCORING METHOD (SIMPLE & ENFORCEABLE)

  • Pass / Fail items:
    • Any ❌ in A, C, or D = short rejected
  • Scored items (0–5):
    • Average score <3.5 = needs re-edit
    • Average score ≥4.0 = approved
    • Average score ≥4.5 = excellent

🚨 RED FLAGS (Instant Fail)

  • Duplicate shorts with only minor trims
  • Slow starts or soft intros
  • Subtitles blocking faces
  • Shorts that only make sense with the full interview

One-line rule for editors

“Every short must stand alone, hook immediately, show emotion, and be usable as a test asset.”

If you want, next I can:

  • Convert this into a Google Sheet scoring template
  • Add a per-editor weekly performance score
  • Create a reject-reason library for faster feedback

Just say which one.