Perfect — this is a quality-control KPI checklist, not volume targets.
Below is a clean, rateable KPI table you can actually use to score editors objectively.
This is written so you can tick ✔ / ✖ or score 0–5.
🎯 EDITOR KPI CHECKLIST — SHORT-FORM VIDEOS (ENTITY-LEVEL)
A. EXTRACTION & COVERAGE
| KPI |
Description |
Pass / Fail |
| Moment Identification |
Short is built around a clear, standalone moment |
⬜ |
| No Dead Time |
No unnecessary pauses, filler, or slow lead-ins |
⬜ |
| One Idea Only |
Short communicates one clear idea / question / reaction |
⬜ |
| Unique Value |
Not a duplicate of another short (angle, hook, or focus differs) |
⬜ |
| Context Intact |
Viewer understands the moment without needing the full interview |
⬜ |
B. HOOK QUALITY (FIRST 1–3 SECONDS)
| KPI |
Description |
Score (0–5) |
| Immediate Engagement |
Something happens immediately (expression, statement, cut) |
⬜ |
| Curiosity Trigger |
Creates a question or tension in the viewer’s mind |
⬜ |
| Emotional Signal |
Clear emotion visible (interest, surprise, tension, amusement) |
⬜ |
| No Soft Intro |
No “so…”, “okay…”, walking, or setup delays |
⬜ |
| Scroll-Stop Potential |
Would you stop scrolling on this? |
⬜ |
C. EDITING & TECHNICAL EXECUTION
| KPI |
Description |
Pass / Fail |
| Clean Cut Points |
No awkward mid-word or mid-gesture cuts |
⬜ |
| Stable Framing |
Subject properly framed (headroom, eye line) |
⬜ |
| Speaker Focus |
Correct person is shown at the right moment |
⬜ |
| Audio Clarity |
Dialogue is clear, balanced, and intelligible |
⬜ |
| Consistent Style |
Matches project’s editing & subtitle style |
⬜ |
D. SUBTITLES & READABILITY
| KPI |
Description |
Pass / Fail |
| Accurate Subtitles |
Subtitles match spoken words exactly |
⬜ |
| Correct Timing |
Subtitles appear in sync with speech |
⬜ |
| Readable Placement |
Not covering face or key visual cues |
⬜ |
| Emphasis Used |
Key words highlighted (when appropriate) |
⬜ |
| No Overcrowding |
Lines are not too long or rushed |
⬜ |
E. PLATFORM READINESS (ENTITY-LEVEL)
| KPI |
Description |
Pass / Fail |
| Vertical Safe Zones |
No text or faces cut by UI elements |
⬜ |
| Thumbnail Frame Exists |
At least one strong frame suitable for thumbnail |
⬜ |
| Duration Optimised |
Length suits the platform (not dragged) |
⬜ |
| Standalone Asset |
Can be posted independently without explanation |
⬜ |
| Reusable |
Clip can be reused across platforms without re-edit |
⬜ |
F. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
| KPI |
Description |
Score (0–5) |
| Fits Testing Workflow |
Designed to test a hook, not tell full story |
⬜ |
| Pre-Selection Friendly |
Shows confidence, reactions, or social proof |
⬜ |
| Reaction Visibility |
Facial expressions / reactions are clearly visible |
⬜ |
| Brand Safe |
No content that damages long-term brand |
⬜ |
| Long-Term Value |
Still usable 6–12 months from now |
⬜ |
🧮 SCORING METHOD (SIMPLE & ENFORCEABLE)
- Pass / Fail items:
- Any ❌ in A, C, or D = short rejected
- Scored items (0–5):
- Average score <3.5 = needs re-edit
- Average score ≥4.0 = approved
- Average score ≥4.5 = excellent
🚨 RED FLAGS (Instant Fail)
- Duplicate shorts with only minor trims
- Slow starts or soft intros
- Subtitles blocking faces
- Shorts that only make sense with the full interview
One-line rule for editors
“Every short must stand alone, hook immediately, show emotion, and be usable as a test asset.”
If you want, next I can:
- Convert this into a Google Sheet scoring template
- Add a per-editor weekly performance score
- Create a reject-reason library for faster feedback
Just say which one.